CAAR Blog

March 31, 2008

NAR Will Channel Data

Filed under: Real Estate — Dave Phillips @ 1:40 pm

I’m thirsty, but not drinking the Kool-aid just yet

The NAR project formally known as the Gateway, a mash-up of all real estate data in the country, has now been relabeled The Real Estate Channel (TREC). There has been a new “interim� report issued by the Presidential Advisory Group (PAG), but still there is very little detailed information about NAR’s plan.

The new report makes it clear that the intent of TREC is NOT to be a national MLS or have a public access point (other than REALTORS®). These two clarifications will ease the fears of many local MLS systems and REALTORS® who were worried about the Gateway project. For others, the idea of a national MLS is appealing and they are still thinking that eventually TREC will become a national MLS, but they are keeping quiet about the prospect for now.

Not making the data publicly accessible is a similar situation. If you are against public access to data (read: still haven’t made the shift to reality), you will feel good about the new clarification. If you don’t worry about your clients having access to data, you will be happy with the report because you know that eventually such a massive mash-up will become available to the public.

So, what the current report says is that NAR will set aside the controversial aspects of the project for now. This seems like a good compromise to keep things moving forward although is does not feel particularly honest. So I find myself struggling between integrity and progress – between trust and fear – between belief and skepticism. Someone referred to the issue in terms of the Wizard of Oz – is there really anything behind the curtain?

The difficulty with this issue is that NAR does not have the details/answers to the questions because this is still a work in progress. This lack of answers causes fear because it is human nature to fill in information voids with negative beliefs. There is so much still unknown about TREC, that there is a lot of negative stuff being made up or inserted into the general thinking on this. NAR is in a tough situation because they need to get the information out to build trust within the membership, but they do not have the answers that will allow members to buy-in to the concept.

I’d really like to be a believer on TREC, but I’m going to have to wait for more information. I’m a glass half full type of guy, so I’m approaching this as a skeptical optimist. I’m thirsty for a good data mash-up for real estate, but I’m not ready to drink the TREC flavored Kool-aid.

I think there is some potential for TREC – not stuff currently being discussed, but other outcomes that are not in the report. I have no insider information and have never been subjected to a non-disclosure agreement on Gateway/TREC, so these ideas should be seen as food for thought.

Suggested Outcomes for TREC

  • Once the mash-up of all property data is complete, TREC should sell the data to the Zillows and Trulias (and REALTOR.coms) of the world and then we would have consistent data everywhere. This assumes that the TREC data is better than what these sites currently have and that remains to be seen.
  • Sell the data to local MLSs for cheaper than what they are currently paying. Most MLS systems have fairly complete public records data and much of what the TREC system will be collecting. So the question is can TREC provide this data cheaper and more efficiently than the current process.
  • Allow REALTORS® and REALTOR® Associations to provide public access to the TREC data through their web sites. This will add value to the member’s web sites which seems like a good trade-off for the millions of dollars of REALTOR® money being spent to develop this system. This will allow the data to be available to the public while pushing consumers to the REALTOR®. In addition, this may be a way to avoid the conflict with REALTOR.com’s exclusive deal with NAR that will prevent them from setting up a TREC public site.

I realize that a lot of folks are not onboard with my skeptical optimism on TREC and probably believe I have already sipped the Kool-aid. Maybe that is true, but I would encourage those who have no trust in NAR pulling this off to hold on until November. I think we will know more by the NAR Convention. Let’s just wait and see – what other choice do we have?

March 24, 2008

Would You Hire Yourself?

Filed under: Leadership, Real Estate — Dave Phillips @ 3:50 pm

This is a very detailed and excellent article every agent should read.  It will rejuvenate, reinvent or depress you.  The choice, like always, is up to you. 

Would You Hire Yourself

CAAR’s New Structure – How’s it Going?

Filed under: Real Estate — Dave Phillips @ 1:07 pm

In January, CAAR introduced a new committee structure to align the organizational governance with the new Strategic Plan and do a better job of offering members meaningful volunteer opportunities.  Okay, I realize that sounds like (and is) a bunch of association geekspeak, so a real world translation is that the new structure will help us do bigger and better things without wasting our members time. 

The old structure had 17 “committees� that struggled with enough content to justify a meeting.  The new structure has 5 Master Groups that focus our resources on the 5 key areas CAAR focuses on:

  • Communications
  • Public Affairs
  • Professional Development
  • Technology
  • Association Operations

In addition to the Master Groups, the new structure is supposed to organically form “project teams� to work on specific tasks.  The idea is that the Groups will work at a more strategic level and leave the “real work� to experts on an ad hoc project team.  This will, in theory, give the Groups more time to think strategically while letting the project teams focus on the details.

So, we are now almost 3 months into this experiment and it is a good time to see how the new structure is working.  The 5 groups have all met at least twice and I have attended almost all these meetings so I could see the new structure in action.  The members of the Groups did a great job of embracing the change and working their way through logistical issues.  In addition, many project teams have been set up to carry the heavier workload.  These project teams are hard to track because they come and go pretty quickly, but my best guess is that we have already utilized between 15 and 20 different project teams and more are being formed each week. 

The real beauty of the new structure is that it allows the Master Groups to think strategically instead of having to get the day to day work done.  Over the years I have attended MANY committee meetings and I have noticed that the Master Group agenda items are far more meaty than 90% of the committees I’m familiar with in associations.  Members genuinely seem to feel that they are doing something important and worthwhile. 

And so do the members who serve on the project teams.  Here is a quote from Dolores Rogers-Nunis who has served on a three project teams already:

“I wanted to take just a moment of your morning to tell you that I love the new organizational set up at CAAR.  I just volunteered for my third project team.  Each one I have volunteered for is something I am interested in and it is focused with an end date in site.  Kuddos to the Board, the staff and you for coming up with such a wonderful idea.�

As an overall grade, I’d give the new structure a solid B+ (A for effort and B for execution).  We still need to get more people involved in the project teams, but other than that, we should be very pleased with the quick change to the new structure. 

March 17, 2008

Albemarle Headed for Deep Trouble

Filed under: Albemarle, Politics, Real Estate — Dave Phillips @ 3:16 pm

There is a cataclysmic clash between perception and reality headed to the largest county in the Charlottesville MSA.  Over the next 10 years, the commercial tax base of Albemarle will be headed in one direction – down – while general costs and citizen expectations of services will continue to rise.  The sad part is that Albemarle, unlike many other localities, is causing this effect.  Natural economic declines have hurt some areas (mainly in other states), but Albemarle’s decline in commercial revenue is self-inflicted.

You only have to look at neighboring counties such as Augusta, Greene, and Louisa to see where Albemarle’s tax base is going.  Augusta has opened up several large retailers in the past few years – Target, Home Depot, etc. – and has plans for more.  Greene is rumored to be getting a Super Wal-mart, Home Depot, and other major retailers.  Louisa already has the Wal-mart Distribution Center and is doing major commercial development at Zion Crossroads.

Albemarle is (or was) the perfect place to be the regional retail center for central Virginia, but the County has shunned efforts by major retailers to locate within the county borders.  Recently, the developer of the upscale shopping center formerly known as Albemarle Place bailed out after years of trying to work through the County’s planning process.  Home Depot has been rejected, as well as many other high-tax-paying businesses. 

Albemarle citizens and leaders have not been shy about their negative feelings toward so-called “big box� retailers.  Keep in mind that these businesses are also called “anchor� stores because they create a base that attracts small box retailers.  So when a community rejects an anchor store, they not only lose the “big� tax revenue, they also lose the tax revenue from several small stores.

Albemarle lost a lot of tax revenue when the Short Pump Mall opened just this side of Richmond.  Now that Augusta/Waynesboro has better shopping than Albemarle, the local tax revenues are off dramatically (around a million dollars).  That decline coupled with lower real estate assessments spells trouble for the County coffers.  Actually, it spells REAL ESTATE TAX INCREASE to those who live in Albemarle.  Once the other counties come online with their major commercial developments, the business tax base will decline even more due to lower sales in Albemarle’s existing retail outlets.  People who currently drive into Albemarle from Greene to shop at Wal-mart and Lowe’s will stop right before the border and will no longer help generate Albemarle tax revenue. 

Albemarle is only at the tip of the iceberg of this situation.  Unless they do a better job of embracing businesses and attracting commercial revenues to the County, they can expect further declines in the tax base.  Citizens may not like big box retail stores, but my guess is that they don’t like paying taxes even more. 

March 9, 2008

Trend #1 from Swanepoel

Filed under: 2008 Trends, Real Estate — Dave Phillips @ 4:15 pm

The 2008 Swanepoel Trends Report, the best summary of real estate trends, recently arrived in my mailbox.  I’m going to provide a trend by trend breakdown to create a 10 post summary of the report.  To purchase the report for yourself, go to www.retrends.com.

Trend #1 Two Worlds; One Industry
The Evolution of Online Communities & Networks
 

The first phase of the Internet was surfing or browsing where you just aimlessly wondered until you stumbled onto something of interest.  Then, powerful search engines like Google and Yahoo let us sort through the Internet with ease.  Now, we are at a third stage where we use the Internet for sharing both personal and business information.  We share on blogs and social networks where users interact with the help of technology.

Social networking is not a new concept – the term was coined in 1954.  It first hit the web in 1995 with classmates.com and other sites.  Later, MySpace and Facebook came along and social networks soared.  As of September 2007, 1 in 20 visits to the Internet went to one of the top 20 social networks.  Americans spend about 12% of their Internet time on social networking sites.  Investors are betting that number will grow dramatically as the value of social sites soars.  Microsoft paid $240 million last year for about a 2% stake in Facebook.

The report lists 5 examples of on-line communities that are worth looking at:

  1. www.linkedin.com – a business oriented social networking site
  2. www.ning.com – allows users to build their own custom social networks.
  3. www.squidoo.com – this is a network of experts who are sharing their knowledge
  4. www.digg.com – users add stories and if other users like the content, they “digg� the story or rate it.
  5. www.secondlife.com – this is a virtual world in which you can live and even do business.

Blogs are great places to share and gain knowledge.  The report list several blogs, but I would suggest the following as must reads for REALTORS® in Charlottesville:

  1. www.varbuzz.com – the official Blog of the State Association of REALTORS®
  2. www.inman.com/blog - great news content
  3. www.RealTown.com – the blog from the Internet Crusade – a very REALTOR® friendly group.
  4. www.narwisdom.com – the unofficial (and often anti) NAR site where you can take part in a frank discussion of the REALTOR® organization.
  5. www.bloodhoundblog.com – Internet marketing and irreverent REALTOR® chatter
  6. www.caarblog.com – this is a self-serving plug for CAAR’s own blog that delivers local Charlottesville market knowledge

Gen Y will be dragging baby boomers kicking and screaming into this new phase of the Internet.  As Sawnepoel puts it, “some of us will adapt, while the others will just watch the events unfold on YouTube.

Other Trend Reports

Trend #2 from Swanepoel

Filed under: 2008 Trends, Real Estate — Dave Phillips @ 3:29 pm

The 2008 Swanepoel Trends Report, the best summary of real estate trends, recently arrived in my mailbox.  I’m going to provide a trend by trend breakdown to create a 10 post summary of the report.  To purchase the report for yourself, go to www.retrends.com.

Trend #2 Pop Goes the Weasel
The Housing Bubble Tightens Its Grip
 

You would have to be in a coma not to know that the housing market has slowed, the financial lending markets are in a subprime mess, and new construction is way down.  It is safe to say that the housing bubble (that NAR and many of the rest of us refused to see) has burst.  The situation is way too complicated to fully explain, but here are several tidbits from the report to chew on:

The entire S & L Crisis of 1990 was 3.7% of GDP.  The subprime mess, at the end of 2007, was already at 3% of GDP and it has gotten worse.

  • There is NOT a lack of buyers, just a lack of buyers who can get financing now that the lending business has tightened the rules.
  • The best estimate is that around 2 million properties will be foreclosed on by the end of 2009.  1 out of 5 subprime mortgages originated in the last two years will end in foreclosure.
  • The problem is nationwide, but several states are really bad.  In Nevada, 1 out of every 154 homes is in foreclosure.  (Last I heard Virginia was at 1 in 2600).
  • The number of vacant homes is up 7% to over 2 million.
  • Home price decreases have snowballed because there are a lot of “badâ€? comps out there due to foreclosures, short sales, and builders slashing prices.
  • Congress may be making matters worse with well intended legislation that has unintended consequences.  The Mortgage Reform and Anti-Predatory Lending Act of 2007 will likely generate a significant increase in litigation against lenders and cause them to tighten lending rules even more.  This means fewer homes will sell and prices may go down further.
  • REALTORS® are in need of training on how to handle short sales because they are becoming much more prevalent.

The report contained a great quote from Warren Buffet:

“When the tide goes out, you find out who’s been swimming naked.�

Other Trend Reports

Trend #3 from Swanepoel

Filed under: 2008 Trends, Real Estate — Dave Phillips @ 1:16 pm

The 2008 Swanepoel Trends Report, the best summary of real estate trends, recently arrived in my mailbox.  I’m going to provide a trend by trend breakdown to create a 10 post summary of the report.  To purchase the report for yourself, go to www.retrends.com.

Trend #3 The New Digital Currency
Livestock, Land, Gold, Oil and Now Information

You may have heard of the 80/20 rule where 20% of the people do 80% of the work.  Well on the Internet, it is the 1% rule.  According to the Swanepoel report, “1% of Internet users are creating most of the user-generated content, 19% of users are interacting with that content and 80% simply view the content as they did in static Web 1.0.”  And creating data is not a problem - we have WAY more information than we can possibly read, digest, or even organize without concentrating full-time on one subject.

This could actually be seen as good news for REALTORS® as they struggle to define their role in the Web 2.0 environment.  Agents can no longer define themselves as salespeople, agents today are far more valuable to consumers as filters and interpreters of information.  REALTORS® who embrace this role are the ones who understand Web 2.0.

In the “old days” REALTORS® were the gatekeepers of information.  After the Internet became popular, they became distributors of information.  With Web 2.0, they need to be the interpreters and filterers of information.  There are a myriad of options to leverage real estate knowledge discussed in the report, but a change in mindset is what REALTORS® will need to be successful.  As Swanepoel puts it, “consider the agent of the future to be a personal shopper that isn’t just focused on price points but on the intangible features that separate neighborhoods and communities.

Other Trend Reports

March 8, 2008

Trend #4 From Swanepoel

Filed under: 2008 Trends, Real Estate — Dave Phillips @ 9:44 pm

The 2008 Swanepoel Trends Report, the best summary of real estate trends, recently arrived in my mailbox. I’m going to provide a trend by trend breakdown to create a 10 post summary of the report. To purchase the report for yourself, go to www.retrends.com.
 

Trend #4 Four Weddings and a Funeral
The Changing Borders and Boundaries of MLS

MLS’s were originally developed, according to NAR, with the intent of serving as “a facility for the orderly correlation and dissemination of listing information so participants may better serve their clients and customers and the public.� Today, they have become much more – they have become “marketplaces for showcasing housing prices and amenities.�


 But the MLS as we know it, is and will be going through enormous change over the next few years. Baby boomers, according to the report, are typically not overly techno-savvy, so they are generally happy with the current MLS systems on the market. Gen X and Y, on the other hand, are demanding more and more from their MLS system. At the route of this generational difference, is Web 2.0 and the interactive philosophy of the younger generations.


 There is also significant geographic pressure on MLS’s to expand/combine their territory. Over the past decade, the natural marketplaces that agents operate in have expanded geographically. With the housing boom, many were priced out of the core markets and real estate markets expanded to meet the customer’s needs. We saw this in the Charlottesville area as Waynesboro, Orange and other “distant� locations became part of the main market. The expanding market area required agents to join multiple MLS systems do business in “their� marketplace.


 34% of REALTORS® surveyed said the ideal MLS boundary would be “statewide,� which was up from 19% the year before. At the very least, agents expect to have one market area served by one MLS. There is a great deal of pressure to “fix� this and MLS’s are starting to address the problem.


 The two most common solutions are as follows:

  1. Merging of MLS systems – about 10 to 15 years ago, there was a major effort to merge MLS systems and we are now in the second wave of these merges. There are organizational turf wars and issues to overcome, but many MLS’s are either planning or looking into merging with one or more neighboring system.
  2. Data sharing – the advent of RETS (Real Estate Transaction Standards) has opened the door for MLS systems to share data with each other. RETS has been around for a few years, but is now really taking off and doing what it intended – allowing the free flow of MLS data. (CAAR is in beta testing with an MLS Alliance product that allows for data sharing between MLS systems. There are 4 other MLS’s that are part of the Alliance and the goal is to make it a statewide system).

Many other changes to the MLS/listing data and the marketing of listings are detailed in the report.  Mobile technology was the most interesting because it is exploding in popularity and will soon take another quantum leap as the next generation (4G) wireless networks are brought online.  This will make the transfer of data and the Internet to your mobile device much faster than it is today.  Text messages and the delivery of MLS data will likely create a whole new frontier and cause MLS rules to have to play catch-up once again.


 Another issue raised in the report is that NAR is losing control of the term MLS.  NAR has used MLS – Multiple Listing Service – for years, but the trademark has already been taken by Major League Soccer.  Recently, NAR and many local associations have tried to pass rules limiting the use of the term, but at least one lawsuit has already been filed by members.  Since NAR does not have the trademark, it is going to be impossible for them to stop the rampant use of the term MLS (i.e., “search the MLS�).  Non-members, including newspapers and websites, can freely use the term and there is nothing NAR can do to stop it.  Many question why NAR does not just create a new term, trademark it, and move on.  That’s exactly what REALTORS® in Indianapolis did when they came up with Broker Listing Cooperative (BLC).


 Other Trend Reports
 

March 5, 2008

Trend #5 from Swanepoel

Filed under: 2008 Trends, Real Estate — Dave Phillips @ 4:15 pm

The 2008 Swanepoel Trends Report, the best summary of real estate trends, recently arrived in my mailbox.  I’m going to provide a trend by trend breakdown to create a 10 post summary of the report.  To purchase the report for yourself, go to www.retrends.com.

Trend #5 In Search of Productivity
Growing Market Share on a Slippery Slope
 
The average annual commission earned for a real estate agent is only $34,020 (before expenses) and there is a lot of pressure on commissions to go down (see trend #9).  To survive in a competitive business like real estate, you must capture more market share to survive.  That, of course, is tougher when the market slows down.  REALTORS® have to work smarter, not just harder, to grow their market share.The report gives us 5 strategies to work smarter:

  1. Maximize technology and the Internet – More and more REALTORS® are advertising on the Internet and taking advantage of other on-line tools to market themselves and the properties they list.  The report lists many innovative on-line services including:
    • Meebome.com – offers a website add-on that allows visitors to IM the REALTOR® and chat with the agent live.
    • MyBlogLog.com – adds social networking functions to a REALTORS® web site including creating an image that can be associated with the visitor.
    • Point 2 – allows REALTORS® to “listâ€? a property on multiple sites and cooperate with other agents easily.
    • Talkshoe.com – allows agents to become a talkshow host and record their own podcasts
  2. Building Teams Correctly – the use of “teams� in real estate is not a new business model, but it is one that seems to be coming of age.  There are two basic types of teams 1) two or more productive agents partnering for greater efficiency and 2) one agent builds a support team to create a small business within a brokerage firm.
  3. Know Where You are Going – In the hot market of 04-07, agents could be successful simply by working hard.  Now they need to have a solid business plan and a good sense of where their business is going.
  4. Using Virtual Assistants – A virtual assistant is someone you hire to perform a specific non-core task (i.e., producing flyers, running reports, etc.).  There are many tasks that agents can delegate to a virtual assistant that frees up their time to do more productive activities.
  5. Diversify Your Business – There are two types of diversification – geographic and product/service.  Agents are finding new ways to create value in the real estate and related markets.

Other Trend Reports  

 

Trend #6 from Swanepoel

Filed under: 2008 Trends, Real Estate — Dave Phillips @ 2:36 pm

The 2008 Swanepoel Trends Report, the best summary of real estate trends, recently arrived in my mailbox.  I’m going to provide a trend by trend breakdown to create a 10 post summary of the report.  To purchase the report for yourself, go to www.retrends.com.

Trend #6 Gone in 60 Seconds
Identity Theft and Data Security Runs Rampant
 

Security and privacy have become major concerns in recent years for everyone and this trend applies to real estate.  The real estate industry has to protect the tons of confidential data/information that comes into industry from buyers, sellers, and other industry sectors.  A lot of related laws and regulations have already been implemented and will be a great deal more are likely to be on the way.  In addition, REALTORS® are implementing more secure systems for protecting data from hackers and protecting their clients and customer’s personal property. 

Hackers are after MLS data and REALTORS® have taken giant steps to protect their clients and customers.  In addition to main stream security firewalls and systems, some MLS’s have instituted specialize security measures like high-tech passkeys and even fingerprint recognition devices. 

Lockboxes have also gone high-tech over the years to make sure homes are secure during the time they are on the market.  CAAR implemented electronic lockboxes almost two years ago to ensure sellers were not compromised by having their property open for showings. 

Other Trend Reports

Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress